Live in care at Home – Elderly home care blog

A blog for discussions and news articles on elderly home care

Live in care at Home – Elderly home care blog header image 2

Beware of engaging a Care Agency Which Supplies Self-Employed Carers

May 6th, 2009 · 1 Comment

Care of the elderly is regulated by the Care Quality Commission (CQC), formerly the Commission for Social Care Inspection (CSCI). The CQC has laid down a set of National Minimum Standards which apply to all organisations involved in providing care services to the elderly, whether they be charities, local authorities, or private agencies.

There are 27 standards which care providers must adhere to in designing, implementing and monitoring the care services they offer. The regulations go into great detail about all aspects of both the provision and management of care services and they leave any would-be provider in no doubt as to the level of professionalism, commitment and dedication required to meet the standards.

However, one glaring anomaly is that, although all organisations providing care services to the elderly are officially bound by the regulations, agencies which supply self-employed carers are exempt from a large number of these same regulations!

If the exemptions related to minor and peripheral aspects of care, this would perhaps be understandable, but the alarming fact is that agencies supplying self-employed carers are allowed to ignore a large number of core regulations which have been specifically designed to ensure the safety and welfare of the very people they are supposed to be looking after.

Historically a lot of care services for the elderly have been provided by local authorities and, even though a lot of their work has now been delegated to private care companies, local authorities still insist that all outsourced care services have to be provided by agencies which employ their carers directly, rather than by those which supply self-employed carers. There is a good reason for local authorities to insist on this and that is, quite simply, that, they do not believe they can trust agencies supplying self-employed carers to provide a professional and reliable care service.

The list of regulations which care agencies supplying self-employed carers can ignore includes a number of key standards which are fundamental to the welfare and safety of vulnerable older people. In particular they are NOT REQUIRED to:-

? Provide clients with a written contract.
? Draw up a personalised care plan for each client.
? Provide a consistent, continuous and reliable care service.
? Draw up and implement policies & procedures in relation to health and safety and medication.
? Carry out any risk assessments.
? Draw up and implement policies and procedures in relation to clients’ money and possessions and in relation to safety and security in clients’ homes.
? Provide a comprehensive daily record of care provided or even of any significant incidents.
? Provide carers with detailed job descriptions.
? Provide carers with any formal training.

Conclusion

Many agencies advertising 24 hour live-in services merely act as introducers of self employed carers, over whose work they have very little control. The agency may make an effort to find suitable carers, but it has no responsibility to train or supervise them or monitor their work. Indeed, in most cases the client will pay the carer directly and pay a separate agency fee on top. These agency fees can be quite substantial and many clients and their families may be left wondering exactly what the agency really does to justify its fees.

If you want to be sure of receiving a professional care service from properly trained carers, then you should engage a care provider which employs its carers directly. Before the service starts, you will receive a visit from an experienced nurse/care assessor who will assess your care needs, consider any risks involved and draw up a detailed care plan. The care will then be delivered in accordance with the plan by a small and settled team of qualified and experienced carers, whose work will be regularly monitored and appraised.

It may cost slightly more to use an agency which employs its carers directly, but it is the only sure way of guaranteeing a professional and reliable service. Not only will this enhance the quality of life of the person being cared for, it will also provide their family and friends with far greater peace of mind.

Share This Post

Tags: Care agencies · Care at home · Live in care

1 response so far ↓

  • 1 maria // May 15, 2009 at 6:12 pm

    i was a live-in carer for 2 yrs for a couple that advertise for a live in carer. I am a certify carer for 10 yrs. Believe me, policies, and all that you mention is nice and true but the so call approve service providers employs casuals, moreor less
    use volunteers to do the home care jobs and are unqualify and i come across many are with mental issues, i was attack in my room by one of this carer from a good service provider is discusting home care services is a regulating shame. Independant aged carers are professional and better equit than the so call approve service providers.
    if you check their stadistick all non profit big organizations and for profit you will see the reality and the gov. is aware as this is provide data and you will find that these org are run by 1 or 2 employees, 100’s volunteers and casuals.
    For my 2 years live-in care i was on centrelink carers payment, when i tried for respite care
    it was shocking, not responsive my senior have to advertice for a carer so i could have time out.
    Respite agencies they inswer the phone, listen,
    they say they will call back but they never return their call and if we use to remind them they us to state that there was not record of our previous call. I can go forever talking about aged care, i being there and done that, i work in agency, home care, hostel, nursing home, and as a centrelink live-in in carers payment, regards maria Australia

Leave a Comment